Digitized Archives

Welcome to our digitized archives! We hope the documents in this digitized collection offers you a productive research opportunity. For the convenience of researchers, each document in this collection is arranged next to its English translation. Although limited in size, this collection contains many documents that are still sensitive today. Accordingly, this collection is the result of more than twenty years of often dangerous efforts to procure information on historical human rights abuses in China. Although it is our hope to one day digitize our entire archives, at the moment we can only digitize a select number of documents. The documents in this collection were chosen by LRF staff for digitization because of their fundamental importance in understanding the Laogai System and its development over time. Below you will find a brief overview of the contents in this collection.

Most of our digitized collection speaks to exactly how the Chinese Communist Party established the Laogai System and what groups of people the Laogai System targeted. Given that the Laogai System matured and solidified during the 1950s, much of our collection originates from that decade. Take, for example, the Central Committee’s May 1951 directive titled  “Third National Public Security Conference’s Resolution to Issues of Organizing National Laogai Prisoners.” This directive details the structure and rationale of the reform through labor system and therefore informed subsequent directives. Yet another directive, the Standing Committee’s August 1957 “Laodong Jiaoyang (Laojiao) Reeducation Through Labor,” details the structure and rationale of the reeducation through labor system.

Our digitized collection also speaks to how the Laogai System transformed during different eras of Chinese history. Our documents from the Cultural Revolution, for example, demonstrate the erosion of a structured and hierarchical Laogai System as China devolved into quasi-anarchy. Conversely, our documents from the immediate post-Cultural Revolution era demonstrate a concerted effort on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party to reassert total control over the Laogai System.

In addition to the development and transformation of the Laogai System, our digitized collection also contains documents that speak to the persecution of specific activities or people. For example, “Exhibition of Incriminating Evidence against Counterrevolutionaries and Other Criminals,” which was compiled and printed for internal use by the Ministry of Public Security in October 1957, details the counterrevolutionary crimes of Catholic Bishop Kung Pin-Mei. Yet another document, written on March 22, 1973 by the Revolutionary Committee of Li County, details the punishment of Zhen Zechun. 


In addition to the digitized collection embedded above that is a translated and downloadable PDF document, below you will find another digitized collection of select Chinese language documents from the Cultural Revolution that can be searched and filtered to simplify the research process.

Feb, 1966

读了姚文元同志的《评新编历史剧(海瑞罢官)》一文,觉得姚文元同志有些批评是正确的,譬如剧本把海瑞描写得非常高大,甚至成了人民过好日子的“救星”,以及把人民描写得软弱无力,只会乞怜于“清官”等等。但是,对于姚文元同志的某些论点和提法,...

Feb, 1966

中央、国务院原则同意《五省精减安置巩固工作座谈会纪要》中的各项意见,现在转发给你们,望参照执行。

解决好精减职工的遗留问题,做好安置巩固工作,关系到许多回乡下乡职工的切身利益,...

Feb, 1966

由吴晗同志的《海瑞罢官》引起的一场大辩论,正在深入地展开。象《海瑞罢官》这样一种历史剧的出现,不是偶然的,也不是个别的。和《海瑞罢官》相呼应,或者说在它“带动之下”,“不甘寂寞跃跃欲试”的孟超同志,发表了他的新编鬼戏《李慧娘》,...

Jan, 1966

(记录稿,未经本人审阅)

同志们:

一年之计在于春,大家都回去过了春节,养精蓄锐,休养生息,现在精神抖擞,准备重返岗位。在入村之前,...

Jan, 1966

实行计划生育,是一件极为重要的大事。中央一九六二年曾经指示各级党委加强领导,实行计划生育;近几年来的经验证明,这不仅符合广大群众要求,而且符合有计划发展我国各项社会主义建设的需要。同时,只要方法对头,群众自愿,就能够做出成绩来。...

Jan, 1966

林彪同志说"突出政治不是一项任意的政策,不是可以这样做,也可以那样做。这是根据社会主义社会的发展规律和社会主义社会的经济基础所提出的根本措施。不突出政治,就是违反社会主义社会发展的规律。"

林彪同志说:...

Jan, 1966

中央同意文化部党委《关于当前文化工作中的若干问题向中央的汇报提纲》。

当前文化战线的形势很好。事实证明,只要按照毛泽东同志所指出的文艺方向去做,整个面貌就会改变。文艺战线是一条重要的战线,...

Jan, 1966

各中央局,各省、市、自治区党委,中央各部委,国家机关和人民团体各党委(组),总政治部:

中央同意文化部党委《关于当前文化工作中的若干问题向中央的汇报提纲》。

当前文化战线上的形势很好。事实证明,...

Jan, 1966

有的同志说,海瑞的“退田”是为了维护中小地主和富农的利益,“平冤狱”是模糊了农民的斗争意志,是强化了地主阶级对农民的专政,这两件事都是为了巩固整个地主阶级的长远利益。事情果真是这样的吗?我愿意谈点不同的意见。

...

Jan, 1966

《人民日报》编者按:去年十二月三十一日,《文汇报》邀请上海史学界、文艺界部分人士,座谈吴晗同志的《关于<海瑞罢官>的自我批评》一文。会上对吴晗同志的这篇自我批评和这场讨论中的有关问题,提出了各种不同的看法。现将《文汇报》...

Jan, 1966

1966年

1月2日

完成一篇约三千字的评论:《从马克思的一封信想到的》(是马克思给库格曼的—封信,见《资本论》附录),借题批判近来报刊上赫赫一时的姚文元的机械主义观点。他反对吴晗的《海瑞》,...

Jun, 2015

我们满怀革命的豪迈心情,肩负着祖国和人民的希望,跨进了一九六六年。在全军欢庆新年的时候,我们谨向捍卫祖国安全、保卫世界和平的陆海空军和公安部队的全体干部战士致敬!向对敌英勇作战、获得光辉胜利的部队致敬!向四好连队、四好单位、...

Pages