計劃生育政策下醜惡的人性（作者：啄木鳥）

當我們對一個人作出評價的時候，使用的最多的一個詞是“善良 ”，如“某某為人正直、善良”“某某很善良”等等，當我們說到自己的時侯，說的最多的一句話是“我是個善良的人”。似乎善良是人人與生俱來的本性，這個觀點也可從我們的古訓中得到印證，所謂：“人之初，性本善”。

然而，人真的是如大家所認為的那樣“人人皆善人”嗎？看了《罪在當代，遺禍千秋》這本書，你就會有不同的答案。

該書是勞改基金會新近出版的對中國計劃生育政策的一個調查研究性報告。眾所周知，計劃生育政策在中國大陸執行已三十年有余，這三十余年裏，中國的每個家庭深受其影響，它不但改變了許多人尤其是婦女和兒童的命運，也改變了中國社會的人口結構，扭曲了社會的倫理道德。

書中通過大量翔實的資料向大家展示了計劃生育政策給中國民眾造成的傷害，給婦女和兒童帶來了怎樣的災難，給社會又造成了什麽樣的影響。尤其是那一樁樁血淋淋的事實後面所折射出的醜惡的人性，更讓人陷入久久的沈思。

計生幹部為了控制民眾的生育率，不惜以極端的、非人道的手段強迫計劃外懷孕婦女墮胎、結紮，對違反政策者進行高額罰款、沒收財產、拘押扣留家屬等非法手段；被譽為白衣天使的醫務人員在計劃生育政策下儼然成了殺嬰的惡魔，竟然可以用手術剪刀眼睜睜將剛出生的嬰兒活活刺死，剪成碎塊，就是因為這個嬰兒沒有準生證；為了生男孩，親生的父母毫不顧念血肉之情，可以將剛出生的女嬰丟棄；為了獲得有限的獎金，鄰裏、鄉親可以成為舉報人，讓超生者無處藏身；為了進補，有人竟然買死嬰做“嬰兒湯”。這些大量的、觸目驚心、慘無人道的事實讓人無法相信它們是發生在二十世紀的今天，發生在號稱有著五千年文明史的中國。我們不禁要問：“他們的人性在哪裏？他們的“善”在哪裏？他們不是為人父母者？他們沒有同胞姐妹？沒有膝下承歡的孩子？“

但是，我們看到整個社會對這樣的罪行都熟視無睹，麻木不仁，很少有人對自己所做的這些事情感到內疚、感到難過，更少有人為自己的行為作出懺悔。計劃生育的悲慘故事仍在繼續上演。

當一個國家用五花八門的政策取代國家的法律時，社會的道德價值觀就扭曲了，人性中醜惡的東西也大行其道了。

计划生育政策下丑恶的人性（作者：啄木鸟）

当我们对一个人作出评价的时候，使用的最多的一个词是“善良 ”，如“某某为人正直、善良”“某某很善良”等等，当我们说到自己的时侯，说的最多的一句话是“我是个善良的人”。似乎善良是人人与生俱来的本性，这个观点也可从我们的古训中得到印证，所谓：“人之初，性本善”。

然而，人真的如大家所认为的那样“人人皆善人”吗？看了《罪在当代，遗祸千秋》这本书，你就会有不同的答案。

该书是劳改基金会新近出版的对中国计划生育政策的一个调查研究性报告。众所周知，计划生育政策在中国大陆执行已三十年有余，这三十余年里，中国的每个家庭深受其影响，它不但改变了许多人尤其是妇女和儿童的命运，也改变了中国社会的人口结构及道德价值观念。

书中通过大量翔实的资料向大家展示了计划生育政策给中国民众造成的伤害，给妇女和儿童带来了怎样的灾难，给社会又造成了什么样的影响。尤其是那一桩桩血淋淋的事实后面所折射出的丑恶的人性，更让人陷入久久的沉思。

计生干部为了控制民众的生育率，不惜以极端的、非人道的手段强迫计划外怀孕妇女堕胎、结扎，对违反政策者进行高额罚款、没收财产、拘押扣留家属等非法手段；被誉为白衣天使的医务人员在计划生育政策下俨然成了杀婴的恶魔，竟然可以用手术剪刀眼睁睁将刚出生的婴儿活活刺死，剪成碎块，就是因为这个婴儿没有准生证；为了生男孩，亲生的父母毫不顾念血肉之情，可以将刚出生的女婴丢弃；为了获得有限的奖金，邻里、乡亲可以成为举报人，让超生者无处藏身；为了进补，有人竟然买死婴做“婴儿汤”。这些大量的、触目惊心、惨无人道的事实让人无法相信它们是发生在二十世纪的今天，发生在号称有着五千年文明史的中国。我们不禁要问：“他们的人性在哪里？他们的“善”在哪里？他们不是为人父母者？他们没有同胞姐妹？没有膝下承欢的孩子？“

但是，我们看到整个社会对这样的罪行都熟视无睹，麻木不仁，很少有人对自己所做的这些事情感到内疚、感到难过，更少有人为自己的行为作出忏悔。计划生育的悲惨故事仍在继续上演。

当一个国家用五花八门的政策取代国家的法律时，当人的权利得不到法律的保障时，在充满利益的社会里，人性中丑恶的东西也大行其道了。

World’s Worse Mass Murderer Wasn’t Hitler or Stalin, but Mao (Opinion) [Guelph Mercury, 1/30/10]

According to the authoritative Black Book of Communism, an estimated 65 million Chinese died as a result of Mao’s repeated, merciless attempts to create a new “socialist” China. Anyone who got in his way was done away with—by execution, imprisonment or forced famine.

Disappearing Act

There appear to be fewer people in China. In a disturbing trend, the government has recently seemingly lost track of some of its most ardent critics. Most recently, the government’s inability to “locate” prominent human rights attorney Gao Zhisheng and 20 Uyghurs who were forcibly returned to China from Cambodia has become a cause for great concern in the international community.

Despite its immense system of internal travel controls and required registration, known as the Hukou system , the CCP has an extensive history of “losing” those who are hard to ignore. Prominent figures such as Deng Xiaoping and Li Peng were lost for significant periods of time during discord within the government, the Panchen Lama has been missing for over a decade, and, more recently, China has continued to lose NGO workers and protestors who portray the regime in a less than flattering light.

Largely, the cases of these “missing” persons have been met with outrage in the international community. Rosanne Rife of Amnesty International put it best when she offered, “It is a disgrace that Chinese law enforcement agencies disobey the law in such a blatant manner.” Not only is “losing” people against Chinese domestic law, but it is a blatant violation of international law as well. Hopefully, pressure from the international community can render these lost persons found before the CCP’s absent-mindedness continues.

两名藏族青年被判重刑

据博讯消息，有两名藏族青年因参加2008年3月的和平抗议游行被中共当局分别判处14年和15年的有期徒刑。这两名藏族青年是37岁的米玛顿珠和24岁的丹增曲扎。

米玛顿珠曾在印度达兰萨拉的西藏儿童村完成学业，后来在印度南部的一所学院里研读商务课程，最后他返回西藏，在拉萨和山南，与当地的农民和牧民一起努力改善其卫生条件，为那里的人们谋取福利，他还呼吁西方人的支持,并积极地参与这些计划，奉献他的所能。他被当局诬陷参与2008年的和平抗议被判处有期徒刑14年。

丹增曲扎也曾在印度达兰萨拉的西藏儿童村完成学业后返回西藏从事社会工作。他曾在拉萨和日喀则等许多地区推动环保工作，2005年回到西藏后在欧洲非政府组织红十字会工作。丹增曲扎参与了2008年3月10日的抗议活动，警方持有他参与示威时的照片，因此遭逮捕判有期徒刑15年，并罚款一万元人民币，现已关押在曲水监狱。

Two Tibetans Sentenced, Others Continue to Be Held Without Charge

According to this Boxun report, two Tibetan men who were arrested for their involvement in the March 2008 protests were recently sentenced by authorities. One man, a 37-year-old native of Shigatse prefecture in Tibet who grew up in India but returned to China to work with impoverished Tibetans, was sentenced to 14 years. The other, a 24-year-old from Lhasa whose father was active in Tibetan politics until he was forced into exile in 1993, was sentenced to 15 years.

The Boxun article comes as Radio Free Asia reports that two Tibetan brothers detained one month ago continue to be held without charge or trial, nor have their family members been allowed to contact them. The men are being held at a detention center in Pashoe county, in the Chamdo area of Tibet. Elsewhere in Chamdo it has been reported that three Tibetan monks from the Jorphu monastery were recently detained, two in late December and one in mid January.

Zhao Dagong Released After Two Weeks

An author who was one of the first signatories to Charter 08, Zhao Shiying (pen name Zhao Dagong) was released yesterday, January 25, after being held by authorities for two weeks. Mr. Zhao's wife confirmed his release, but did not mention any details of the case, saying only, "He's resting at home." Zhao is well known for being an outspoken critic of the current regime. He also serves as Secretary General of the Independent Chinese PEN Center, an organization that promotes freedom of speech worldwide. It is unclear why Mr. Zhao was detained in the first place, nor is it clear why he was suddenly released. Such harassment, however, is not unusual for Chinese dissidents.

“中国互联网发展和管理的方针政策符合中国国情和国际通行做法”——中国政府你还要不要脸？！

“中国依法保护网上言论自由，保护网上知识产权，保护未成年人健康成长，禁止利用互联网颠覆国家政权、破坏国家统一，煽动民族仇恨和民族分裂、宣扬邪教以及散布淫秽、色情、暴力和恐怖等信息。中国依法处置这些有害信息有充分的法律依据，不容置疑，与所谓“限制网络自由”完全是风马牛不相及的两回事。世界各国的国情不同，经济社会发展程度不同，文化传统和社会关切不同，因此，依法管理互联网的办法也不会完全相同。中国十分注重吸取各国治理互联网的有益经验，同包括美国在内的许多国家开展了多种形式的交流。事实说明，中国对互联网依法管理，关系国家安全和社会稳定，关系国家主权、尊严和人民群众根本利益，方针政策和管理办法符合中国的国情和许多国家的通行做法。”

以上这段话是中国国务院新闻办发言人接受新华社专访时所说的，中国政府这样睁眼说瞎话、颠倒是非的做法已然司空见惯，言及人权、民主则必称“中国国情”，“国情”成了中国政府为所欲为、控制民众的万灵药。“禁用词测试软件“、”绿坝“、”金盾“、”网络色情严打“，这些才是真正具有中国特色的东西，请问中国政府，这些是哪儿的”许多国家的通行做法“呢？

用一句中国的粗语来形容中国政府这种做派倒再贴切不过了：见过不要脸的，没见过这么不要脸的。

“中國互聯網發展和管理的方針政策符合中國國情和國際通行做法”——中國政府你還要不要臉？！

“中國依法保護網上言論自由，保護網上知識產權，保護未成年人健康成長，禁止利用互聯網顛覆國家政權、破壞國家統一，煽動民族仇恨和民族分裂、宣揚邪教以及散布淫穢、色情、暴力和恐怖等信息。中國依法處置這些有害信息有充分的法律依據，不容置疑，與所謂“限制網絡自由”完全是風馬牛不相及的兩回事。世界各國的國情不同，經濟社會發展程度不同，文化傳統和社會關切不同，因此，依法管理互聯網的辦法也不會完全相同。中國十分註重吸取各國治理互聯網的有益經驗，同包括美國在內的許多國家開展了多種形式的交流。事實說明，中國對互聯網依法管理，關系國家安全和社會穩定，關系國家主權、尊嚴和人民群眾根本利益，方針政策和管理辦法符合中國的國情和許多國家的通行做法。”

以上這段話是中國國務院新聞辦發言人接受新華社專訪時所說的，中國政府這樣睜眼說瞎話、顛倒是非的做法已然司空見慣，言及人權、民主則必稱“中國國情”，“國情”成了中國政府為所欲為、控制民眾的萬靈藥。“禁用詞測試軟件“、”綠壩“、”金盾“、”網絡色情嚴打“，這些才是真正具有中國特色的東西，請問中國政府，這些是哪兒的”許多國家的通行做法“呢？

用一句中國的粗語來形容中國政府這種做派倒再貼切不過了：見過不要臉的，沒見過這麽不要臉的。

Google Values of Openness Chafe Under Censorship

Google's China operation has been grabbing global headlines since last Tuesday, when it announced that it would plan to stop censoring Google.cn search results or pull out of China after discovering a significant attack on it's technology infrastructure. Later Google clarified that it was interested in staying in China, but would plan to reduce censorship of its Chinese search results. Official Chinese media has dismissed Google's human rights concerns as ridiculous, stating "Whatever the real cause for Google's possible move, this case is purely business in nature and it should have nothing to do with political ideology" and adding that it was "inappropriate to play up the issue, or turn it into a political one."

But Google's business model is particularly dependent upon a political ideology - their own, very public, vision of the Open Internet, which Secretary of State Hillary Clinton referred to yesterday when she proclaimed that the United States "stand[s] for a single internet where all of humanity has equal access to knowledge and ideas." Google has become a particularly strong voice for this growing movement toward true openness, not merely the absence of censorship but also the active practice of business transparency, content fair use, and open technology. Their strength in the field of technology is in no small part because of their politics, and while it is true that they submitted to censorship to enter Chinese markets in 2006, in many other ways they've continued investing in the "openness" movement at home (and, of course, sparking controversy within it). [Read more after the jump]

After all this business investment in the ideology of openness, it seems ridiculous for Chinese media to juxtapose Google's political imperative with its business imperative in China. There may have been a number of factors prompting Google's announcement, but it can without exaggeration be seen as another public commitment to the Open Internet. Rebecca McKinnon points out in the panel below that "[censorship] is not just a China problem... Google is making a stand about the global internet. This is really about the future of the global internet." Kudos to Google for taking that stand.

News & Views